Title
What happened to participatory research at the International Potato Center?
Date Issued
01 January 2001
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
CIP, Papa Andina Project
Publisher(s)
Springer Netherlands
Abstract
During the 1980s, when a flexible approach to research, known as farmer-back-to-farmer, was developed, the International Potato Center (CIP) became famous for participatory research. Subsequently it appeared to have lost leadership in this field. This article documents participatory research activities in CIP over the past thirty years to find out what happened. Even in the 1980s, implementation of participatory research was actually limited. Participatory research in the center grew unevenly, with little clear encouragement from the CGIAR. Decentralization of social scientists in the 1990s led to the fragmentation of participatory research and, in the absence of any clear champion, it seemed that it might wither away. Recently, increasing interest in IPM, donor support, and the recruitment of international staff who have been exposed to other currents of participatory research and training has led to a revival of interest. This needs to be carefully nurtured to ensure that the flexibility for which participatory research in CIP earlier gained world renown is retained. © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Start page
429
End page
446
Volume
18
Issue
4
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ciencias agrícolas
Agricultura
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-4344593835
Source
Agriculture and Human Values
ISSN of the container
0889048X
Sponsor(s)
Alongside of the much broader approach taken in UPWARD, CIP increased the participatory element in NARIs through special potato research projects financed by the Swiss government in Latin America (PROINPA, FORTIPAPA, and SEINPA).
Recently, a PROINPA breeder, with support from Graham Thiele, a CIP anthropologist, has developed a participatory plant-breeding project financed by the PRGA. After discovery based training in simple genetics and breeding methods, farmers choose progenitors, make crosses, and evaluate progenies with the idea of developing their own varieties (Gabriel et al., 2000).20
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus