Title
Breast cancer screening and diagnosis: A synopsis of the european breast guidelines
Date Issued
07 January 2020
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Schünemann H.J.
Lerda D.
Quinn C.
Follmann M.
Alonso-Coello P.
Rossi P.G.
Lebeau A.
Nyström L.
Broeders M.
Ioannidou-Mouzaka L.
Duffy S.W.
Borisch B.
Fitzpatrick P.
Hofvind S.
Castells X.
Giordano L.
Warman S.
Mansel R.
Sardanelli F.
Parmelli E.
Gräwingholt A.
Saz-Parkinson Z.
Publisher(s)
American College of Physicians
Abstract
Description: The European Commission Initiative for Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis guidelines (European Breast Guidelines) are coordinated by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre. The target audience for the guidelines includes women, health professionals, and policymakers. Methods: An international guideline panel of 28 multidisciplinary members, including patients, developed questions and corresponding recommendations that were informed by systematic reviews of the evidence conducted between March 2016 and December 2018. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used to structure the process and minimize the influence of competing interests by enhancing transparency. Questions and recommendations, expressed as strong or conditional, focused on outcomes that matter to women and provided a rating of the certainty of evidence. Recommendations: This synopsis of the European Breast Guidelines provides recommendations regarding organized screening programs for women aged 40 to 75 years who are at average risk. The recommendations address digital mammography screening and the addition of hand-held ultrasonography, automated breast ultrasonography, or magnetic resonance imaging compared with mammography alone. The recommendations also discuss the frequency of screening and inform decision making for women at average risk who are recalled for suspicious lesions or who have high breast density.
Start page
46
End page
56
Volume
172
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Oncología
DOI
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85077931254
PubMed ID
Source
Annals of Internal Medicine
ISSN of the container
00034819
Source funding
Bayer
Sponsor(s)
Disclosures: Members of the GDG do not receive financial compensation for their work but are reimbursed by the European Commission for travel-related expenses for the meetings organized by the Joint Research Centre. Dr. Schünemann reports that the European Commission had chosen to use GRADE as one of the core methods for its guidelines before involving Dr. Schünemann. He was invited to participate in the guideline development as a methodologist and was elected by the ECIBC GDG as its cochair. He is also cochair of the GRADE working group and has codeveloped its methodology and tools, was commissioned by the National Academy of Sciences to write the background reports for the Institute of Medicine standards for trustworthy guideline development with coauthors, has conducted Cochrane reviews (currently is director of Cochrane Canada), and is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Guidelines International Network. He has not received direct financial payments for ECIBC work but has received travel support and is under contract from the European Commission for a project relating to other guideline methods. Dr. Quinn is the chair of the European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology (EWGBSP). Various companies have provided some sponsorship to the EWGBSP for group meetings. Dr. Alonso-Coello reports that his institution received payments from the European Commission to develop the systematic reviews informing the recommendations. He coordinated the systematic review team informing the guidelines. He is a member of the GRADE guidance group of the GRADE working group and a member of the board of the Guidelines International Network. He has contributed to the development of some of the methodology and tools. Dr. Giorgi Rossi reports that he published opinions about the superiority of public, organized, population-based screening programs instead of opportunistic and private screening, according to the European Commission recommendations 2003/878/EC. He is on the steering committee of MyPeBS (My Personal Breast Screening), a European multicentric trial to compare the effectiveness of personalized screening programs and standard protocols, and of the RETomo and MAITA trials, comparing digital mammography and DBT in breast cancer screening. Dr. Lebeau reports grants and reimbursement for travel-related expenses related to consultancy from Roche Pharma and Novartis Oncology, and grants from BioNTech Diagnostics, outside the submitted work. Dr. Leb-eau reports that she is chair of the Breast Pathology Working Group of the German S3 Guidelines for the Early Detection, Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up of Breast Cancer; a member of the Scientific Advisory Council for the Cooperation Alliance Mammography (Kooperationsgemeinschaft Mammog-raphie GBR), Germany; a member of the certification commission “breast cancer centres” as a representative of the German Society of Pathology and the Federal Association of German Pathologists; and a board member of the German Society of Pathology. Dr. Hofvind reports permanent employment as a researcher at the Cancer Registry of Norway, independent of her job as administrative leader of BreastScreen Norway. Dr. Canelo-Aybar reports that his institution received payments from the European Commission to develop the systematic reviews informing the recommendations. He is a member of the GRADE Working Group. Dr. Sardanelli is responsible for the department of radiology performing mammographic screening at the IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy. He is a member of the executive board of the European Society of Breast Imaging and codirector of the Breast MRI training course run by this society; director of the European Network for Assessment of Imaging in Medicine, joint initiative of the European Institute for Biomedical Imaging Research; editor-in-chief of European Radiology Experimental; and a recipient of research grants from Bracco, Bayer, and General Electric. Dr. Sardanelli is not a member of the GDG but did participate in formulating the recommendations. Dr. Parmelli is employed by the European Commission. Dr. Gräwingholt is head of the mammography screening cen- ter Paderborn, consultant radiologist for screening programs in Switzerland, and consultant radiologist for Hellenic School of Senology. Dr. Saz-Parkinson is employed by the European Commission, coordinating the ECIBC's GDG. Authors not named here have disclosed no conflicts of interest. Disclosures can also be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors /icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum= M19-2125.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus