Title
Randomised trial of once-daily vilanterol in children with asthma on inhaled corticosteroid therapy
Date Issued
05 April 2016
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Oliver A.J.
Covar R.A.
Goldfrad C.H.
Klein R.M.
Pedersen S.E.
Sorkness C.A.
Tomkins S.A.
Grigg J.
Publisher(s)
BioMed Central Ltd.
Abstract
Background: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are effective maintenance treatments for childhood asthma; however, many children remain uncontrolled. Vilanterol (VI) is an inhaled long-acting beta-2 agonist which, in combination with the ICS fluticasone furoate, is being explored as a once-daily treatment for asthma in children. We evaluated the dose-response, efficacy, and safety of once-daily VI (6.25μg, 12.5μg and 25μg) administered in the evening over 4weeks, on background fluticasone propionate (FP) in children with asthma inadequately controlled on ICS. Methods: This was a Phase IIb, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study in children ages 5-11 years with persistent asthma on ICS and as-needed short-acting beta-agonist. The study comprised a 4-week run-in, 4-week treatment period, and 1-week follow-up. From study start, children replaced their current ICS with open-label FP 100μg twice daily. Children were randomised to receive placebo, VI 6.25μg, VI 12.5μg or VI 25μg once daily. Primary endpoint was treatment difference between VI 25 and placebo groups in mean change from baseline in evening peak expiratory flow averaged over the 4-week treatment. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at Week 4 and change from baseline in percentage of rescue-free and symptom-free 24-h periods. Safety assessments included incidence of adverse events (AEs) and asthma exacerbations. Results: In total, 456 children comprised the intention-to-treat population. The adjusted treatment difference between VI 25 and placebo groups for the primary endpoint was not statistically significant (p = 0.227) so no statistical inference was made for other VI dose comparisons or other endpoints. No difference in change from baseline in trough FEV1 was observed for any VI treatments versus placebo; however, VI 25 resulted in an additional 0.6 rescue-free days and 0.7 symptom-free days per week versus placebo. The incidence of AEs was slightly higher in the VI groups (28-33 %) versus placebo (22 %). Nine children experienced asthma exacerbations during the treatment period. Conclusion: VI plus FP did not result in significant improvements in lung function versus placebo plus FP, but was well tolerated at all doses assessed. Trial registration:NCT01573767(ClinicalTrials.gov).
Volume
17
Issue
1
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Pediatría
Sistema respiratorio
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84962091228
PubMed ID
Source
Respiratory Research
ISSN of the container
14659921
Sponsor(s)
The authors wish to thank Ann Allen for pharmacokinetic expertise. Editorial support in the form of initial preparation of the outline based on input from all authors, and collation and incorporation of author feedback to develop subsequent drafts, assembling tables and figures, copyediting, and referencing was provided by Matthew Robinson, DPhil, of Fishawack Indicia Ltd, and was funded by GSK.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus