Title
Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America
Date Issued
03 June 2006
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Villar J.
Valladares E.
Wojdyla D.
Carroli G.
Velazco A.
Shah A.
Campodónico L.
Bataglia V.
Faundes A.
Langer A.
Narváez A.
Donner A.
Romero M.
Reynoso S.
Simônia de Pádua K.
Giordano D.
Kublickas M.
Acosta A.
Publisher(s)
Elsevier B.V.
Abstract
Background: Caesarean delivery rates continue to increase worldwide. Our aim was to assess the association between caesarean delivery and pregnancy outcome at the institutional level, adjusting for the pregnant population and institutional characteristics. Methods: For the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health, we assessed a multistage stratified sample, comprising 24 geographic regions in eight countries in Latin America. We obtained individual data for all women admitted for delivery over 3 months to 120 institutions randomly selected from of 410 identified institutions. We also obtained institutional-level data. Findings: We obtained data for 97 095 of 106 546 deliveries (91% coverage). The median rate of caesarean delivery was 33% (quartile range 24-43), with the highest rates of caesarean delivery noted in private hospitals (51%, 43-57). Institution-specific rates of caesarean delivery were affected by primiparity, previous caesarean delivery, and institutional complexity. Rate of caesarean delivery was positively associated with postpartum antibiotic treatment and severe maternal morbidity and mortality, even after adjustment for risk factors. Increase in the rate of caesarean delivery was associated with an increase in fetal mortality rates and higher numbers of babies admitted to intensive care for 7 days or longer even after adjustment for preterm delivery. Rates of preterm delivery and neonatal mortality both rose at rates of caesarean delivery of between 10% and 20%. Interpretation: High rates of caesarean delivery do not necessarily indicate better perinatal care and can be associated with harm. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Start page
1819
End page
1829
Volume
367
Issue
9525
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Obstetricia, Ginecología
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-33744551127
PubMed ID
Source
Lancet
ISSN of the container
01406736
Sponsor(s)
We thank P Bergsjö, E O Akande, and D Oluwole, for help during the preparatory phase of the survey and for advice and support during its implementation; J Volmink and C Murphy for help during the planning phase of the survey in the African region and their contribution to its overall conception; M Taljaard for her input re analytical strategy and early drafts of the report; M Kramer, who participated in data analysis and made major contributions to the manuscript; S Marthinsson for technical support to the online data entry system; and M E Stanton for continuous support. The WHO Maternal and Perinatal Health Unit, Geneva, Switzerland, and the Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina, coordinated the survey. The survey was funded by the UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, and the US Agency for International Development (USAID).
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus