Title
Indigenous tenure security and local participation in climate mitigation programs: Exploring the institutional gaps of REDD+ implementation in the Peruvian Amazon
Date Issued
01 July 2020
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Publisher(s)
John Wiley and Sons Ltd
Abstract
The Reduction of Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) mechanism faces implementation challenges related to tenure security and governance institutions. In response, multiple regional climate mitigation initiatives have emerged. In Peru, indigenous networks have created their own Indigenous Amazonian REDD (RIA), an initiative aiming to strengthen property rights for native peoples. At roughly the same time, the Peruvian government launched the National Forest Conservation Program (PNCB), a conditional payment scheme aiming to encourage sustainable forest management. However, these initiatives must still overcome fragmented institutional governance of forests at the regional scale and continued challenges related to indigenous tenure security. This article examines how indigenous federations and the Peruvian government are attempting to implement these initiatives in the Amazonian region of Madre de Dios to examine how challenges play out in practice. These cases illustrate the institutional gaps between national policies, regional capacities, and local needs and expectations. However, it also demonstrates how an innovative institutional partnership at the subnational scale may be overcoming some of these challenges.
Start page
209
End page
220
Volume
30
Issue
4
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ecología Conservación de la Biodiversidad
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85083738600
Source
Environmental Policy and Governance
ISSN of the container
1756932X
Sponsor(s)
The research for this article was carried out in collaboration with CIFOR’s ‘Global Comparative Study on Forest Tenure Reform’ which is funded by the European Commission and the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) with technical support from the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and the United Nations Organization for Food and Agriculture (FAO). This study forms part of the Program on Policies, Institutions and Markets (PIM), led by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); and the CGIAR Research Program on Forest, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA), led by CIFOR. The opinions expressed in this paper represent the analysis of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of IFPRI, CIFOR, CGIAR or the financial sponsors. Finally, the authors want to thank the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) for financing the 1‐year mobility grant in CIFOR as part of the doctoral thesis of the main author.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus