Title
Is Labor a suitable input in LCA + DEA studies? Insights on the combined use of economic, environmental and social parameters
Date Issued
01 September 2013
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Iribarren D.
Resource Centre for Environmental Technologies
Publisher(s)
MDPI AG
Abstract
Economic, social and environmental dimensions are usually accepted as the three pillars of sustainable development. However, current methodologies for the assessment of the sustainability of product systems fail to cover economic, environmental and social parameters in a single combined approach. Even though the perfect methodology is still far off, this article attempts to provide insights on the potentials of the five-step LCA + DEA method, based on both Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodologies, to cope with operational (economic), environmental and social parameters when evaluating multiple similar entities. The LCA + DEA methodology has already been proven to be a suitable approach for the evaluation of a homogenous set of units from an operational and environmental perspective, while allowing the consideration of economic aspects. However, this is the first study focused on the implementation of social parameters in LCA + DEA studies. The suitability of labor as an additional DEA item is evaluated to validate this integrative LCA + DEA concept. Illustrative case studies are used to show the advantages and drawbacks associated with the use of labor in terms of number of workers and number of working hours. In light of the results, the integrative LCA + DEA concept is seen as an all-in-one methodology, which is easy to implement, even though relevant limitations should be discussed in order to guarantee an appropriate interpretation of the social results derived from the proposed method.
Start page
114
End page
130
Volume
2
Issue
3
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Geografía económica y cultural
Ciencias del medio ambiente
Econometría
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84885951101
Source
Social Sciences
ISSN of the container
20760760
Sponsor(s)
The authors would like to thank the anonymous participants who kindly provided detailed data for the case studies included in this article. Diego Iribarren would like to thank Instituto IMDEA Energía for funding his research stay at CRP Henri Tudor (Luxembourg).
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus