Title
A randomized and open-label trial evaluating the addition of pazopanib to lapatinib as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer
Date Issued
01 February 2013
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Johnston S.R.D.
Stemmer S.M.
Richie M.
Durante M.
Pandite L.
Goodman V.
Slamon D.
Abstract
This phase II study (VEG20007; NCT00347919) with randomized and open-label components evaluated first-line lapatinib plus pazopanib therapy and/or lapatinib monotherapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Patients were enrolled sequentially into two cohorts: Cohort 1, patients were randomly assigned to lapatinib 1,000 mg plus pazopanib 400 mg or lapatinib 1,500 mg monotherapy; Cohort 2, patients received lapatinib 1,500 mg plus pazopanib 800 mg. The primary endpoint was week-12 progressive disease rate (PDR) for Cohort 1. The principal secondary endpoint was week-12 response rate (RR) for Cohort 2. Efficacy was assessed in patients with centrally confirmed HER2 positivity (modified intent-to-treat population [MITT]). The study enrolled 190 patients (Cohort 1, combination n = 77, lapatinib n = 73; Cohort 2, n = 40). The MITT population comprised n = 141 (Cohort 1) and n = 36 (Cohort 2). In Cohort 1, week-12 PDRs were 36.2 % (combination) versus 38.9 % (lapatinib; P = 0.37 for the difference). Week-12 RRs were 36.2 % (combination) versus 22.2 % (lapatinib). In Cohort 2, week-12 RR was 33.3 %. In Cohort 1, grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) included diarrhea (combination, 9 %; lapatinib, 5 %) and hypertension (combination, 5 %; lapatinib, 0 %). Grades 3/4 AEs in Cohort 2 included diarrhea (40 %), hypertension (5 %), and fatigue (5 %). Alanine aminotransferase elevations >5 times the upper limit of normal occurred in Cohort 1 (combination, 18 %; lapatinib, 5 %) and Cohort 2 (20 %). Upon conclusion, the combination of lapatinib plus pazopanib did not improve PDR compared with lapatinib monotherapy, although RR was increased. Toxicity was higher with the combination, including increased diarrhea and liver enzyme elevations. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Start page
755
End page
766
Volume
137
Issue
3
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Farmacología, Farmacia Oncología
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84879338637
PubMed ID
Source
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
ISSN of the container
15737217
Sponsor(s)
Conflict of interest Drs. Richie, Durante, Pandite, and Goodman are GlaxoSmithKline employees and stock holders. Drs. Johnston and Slamon have received speakers bureau honoraria from Glaxo-SmithKline and Dr. Johnston’s institution has received research funding from GlaxoSmithKline. Drs. Gómez and Stemmer report no competing financial interests.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus