cris.boxmetadata.label.title
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of istiratumab (MM-141) plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in front-line metastatic pancreatic cancer (CARRIE)
cris.boxmetadata.label.dateissued
01 browse.startsWith.months.january 2020
cris.boxmetadata.label.accesslevel
open access
cris.boxmetadata.label.resourcetype
journal article
cris.boxmetadata.label.authors
Kundranda M.
Gracian A.C.
Zafar S.F.
Meiri E.
Bendell J.
Algül H.
Rivera F.
Ahn E.R.
Watkins D.
Pelzer U.
Charu V.
Zalutskaya A.
Kuesters G.
Pipas J.M.
Askoxylakis V.
Ko A.H.
Clinical Development
cris.boxmetadata.label.publisher
Elsevier Ltd
cris.boxmetadata.label.abstract
Background: Preclinical data suggest that dual blockade of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) and HER3 pathways has superior activity to IGF-1R blockade alone in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We tested whether istiratumab, an IGF-1R- and ErbB3-bispecific antibody, can enhance the efficacy of standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy in patients with metastatic PDAC selected for high IGF-1 serum levels. Patients and methods: CARRIE was an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study for patients with previously untreated metastatic PDAC. In part 1, 10 patients were evaluated for pharmacokinetics and safety. In part 2, patients with high free serum IGF-1 levels were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either istiratumab [2.8 g intravenously (i.v.) every 2 weeks] or placebo combined with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel at approved dose schedule. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with high IGF-1 levels and PFS in patients with both high serum IGF-1 levels and heregulin (HRG)+ tumors. Key secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v.1.1, and adverse events (AEs) rate. Results: A total of 317 patients were screened, with 88 patients randomized in part 2 (experimental arm n = 43; control n = 45). In the high IGF-1 cohort, median PFS was 3.6 and 7.3 months in the experimental versus control arms, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.88, P = 0.027]. In the high IGF-1/HRG+ subgroup (n = 44), median PFS was 4.1 and 7.3 months, respectively (HR = 1.39, P = 0.42). Median OS and ORR for the overall population were similar between two arms. No significant difference in serious or grade ≥3 AEs was observed, although low-grade AEs leading to early discontinuation were higher in the experimental (39.5%) versus control arm (24.4%). Conclusions: Istiratumab failed to improve the efficacy of SOC chemotherapy in this patient setting. High serum IGF-1 levels did not appear to be an adverse prognostic factor when compared with non-biomarker-selected historic controls. Clinical Trial Registration numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02399137; EUDRA CT: 2014-004572-34.
cris.boxmetadata.label.citationstartpage
79
cris.boxmetadata.label.citationendpage
87
cris.boxmetadata.label.volume
31
cris.boxmetadata.label.issue
1
cris.boxmetadata.label.language
English
cris.boxmetadata.label.ocdeknowledgeArea
Farmacología, Farmacia Oncología
cris.boxmetadata.label.doi
cris.boxmetadata.label.scopusidentifier
2-s2.0-85077704517
cris.boxmetadata.label.pubmedidentifier
cris.boxmetadata.label.source
Annals of Oncology
cris.boxmetadata.label.containerissn
09237534
cris.boxmetadata.label.sponsor
This trial was funded by Merrimack Pharmaceuticals,Inc. There are no grant numbers for this trial. Merrimack Pharmaceuticals had roles in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; and decision to submit paper for publication. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study; was responsible for writing of the report; and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. This trial was funded by Merrimack Pharmaceuticals,Inc. There are no grant numbers for this trial. MK: Research funding (paid to institution): Celgene, Chronix, Merck. Consultant or Advisory Role: Bayer and Amgen. HA: Speaker for Celgene and Servier; Research grant from Chugai. FR: Consultant or Advisory Role: Roche, Merck-Serono, Amgen, MSD, BMS, Lilly, Celgene, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer. Research Funding: Roche, Merck-Serono, Amgen, MSD, Lilly, Celgene, Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer. Speaking: Roche, Merck-Serono, Amgen, MSD, BMS, Lilly, Celgene, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Bayer. Grant support: Amgen. DW: Amgen?Funding to support educational conference attendance. UP: Consultant or Research grants: Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Servier, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Shire, B. Braun, and Halozyme. AZ, VA, GK, JMP, and SS were Merrimack employees at the time of the study. AK: Research funding (paid to institution): Celgene, Roche/Genentech, Merrimack, Halozyme, Merck, BMS, Astellas, AbGenomics, Apexigen. Consultant or Advisory Role: Celgene, ARMO BioSciences, Gilead, Gritstone. ACG, SFZ, EM, JB, ERA, and VC have declared no conflicts of interest.
peru-layout.shadow-copies Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus