Title
Women's values and preferences regarding osteoporosis treatments: A systematic review
Date Issued
01 January 2019
Access level
open access
Resource Type
review
Author(s)
Gionfriddo M.R.
Bora P.
Mohammed K.
Benkhadra K.
Sarigianni M.
Murad M.H.
Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic
Publisher(s)
Oxford University Press
Abstract
Background: Several treatments are available to reduce the risk of fragility fractures associated with osteoporosis. The choice of treatment requires knowledge of patients' values and preferences. The aim of the present study was to summarize what is known about the values and preferences relevant to the management of osteoporosis in women. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases for studies reported in any language that had included women who had already started or were about to start any pharmacological therapy for osteoporosis. Pairs of reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted the data. The results were synthesized narratively. Results: We included 26 studies reporting on 15,348 women (mean age, 66 years). The women considered the effectiveness and adverse events equally, followed by the convenience of taking the drug and its effect on daily routine (less frequent dosing was preferred, the oral route was preferred, and the injectable route was preferred over oral if given less frequently). The treatment cost and duration were less important factors for decision making. Fear of breast cancer and fear of resuming uterine bleeding were common reasons for not choosing estrogen therapy. Calcium and vitamin D were viewed as safe and natural. Across the studies, the preferences were not affected by age, previous drug exposure, or employment status. Conclusions: Women starting osteoporosis medications value effectiveness and side effects equally and prefer medications given less frequently. Injectable drugs appear acceptable if given less frequently. More research on patient values and preferences is needed to guide decision making in osteoporosis.
Start page
1631
End page
1636
Volume
104
Issue
5
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
ReumatologĆa
OrtopedĆa
OrtopedĆa
Temas sociales
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85063920096
PubMed ID
Source
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
ISSN of the container
0021972X
Sponsor(s)
The present review was partially funded by a contract from the Endocrine Society. M.R.G. was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (Clinical Translational Science Awards grant TL1 TR000137). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Endocrine Society or National Institutes of Health.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción CientĆfica
Scopus