Title
The effect of a priest-led intervention on the choice and preference of soda beverages: A cluster-randomized controlled trial in catholic parishes
Date Issued
01 January 2021
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Publisher(s)
Oxford University Press
Abstract
Background Latin America ranks among the regions with the highest level of intake of sugary beverages in the world. Innovative strategies to reduce the consumption of sugary drinks are necessary. Purpose Evaluate the effect of a one-off priest-led intervention on the choice and preference of soda beverages. Methods We conducted a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in Catholic parishes, paired by number of attendees, in Chimbote, Peru between March and June of 2017. The priest-led intervention, a short message about the importance of protecting one’s health, was delivered during the mass. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals that choose a bottle of soda instead of a bottle of water immediately after the service. Cluster-level estimates were used to compare primary and secondary outcomes between intervention and control groups utilizing nonparametric tests. Results Six parishes were allocated to control and six to the intervention group. The proportion of soda selection at baseline was ~60% in the intervention and control groups, and ranged from 56.3% to 63.8% in Week 1, and from 62.7% to 68.2% in Week 3. The proportion of mass attendees choosing water over soda was better in the priest-led intervention group: 8.2% higher at Week 1 (95% confidence interval 1.7%–14.6%, p = .03), and 6.2% higher at 3 weeks after baseline (p = .15). Conclusions This study supports the proof-of-concept that a brief priest-led intervention can decrease sugary drink choice.
Start page
436
End page
446
Volume
54
Issue
6
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Nutrición, Dietética
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85085533680
PubMed ID
Source
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
ISSN of the container
08836612
Sponsor(s)
Funding The study was supported by the Center for Advanced Hindsight, Duke University and Universidad Católica los Ángeles de Chimbote. J.J. Miranda acknowledges having received support from the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (HQHSR1206660), DFID/MRC/Wellcome Global Health Trials (MR/M007405/1), Fogarty International Center (R21TW009982, D71TW010877), Grand Challenges Canada (0335-04), International Development Research Center Canada (IDRC 106887, 108167), Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI CRN3036), Medical Research Council (MR/P008984/1, MR/P024408/1, MR/P02386X/1), National Cancer Institute (1P20CA217231), National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (HHSN268200900033C, 5U01HL114180, 1UM1HL134590), National Institute of Mental Health (1U19MH098780), Swiss National Science Foundation (40P740-160366), Wellcome Trust (074833/Z/04/Z, 093541/Z/10/Z, 107435/Z/15/Z, 103994/Z/14/Z, 205177/Z/16/Z, 214185/Z/18/Z), and the World Diabetes Foundation (WDF15-1224). A. Taype-Rondan received support as trainee from the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI CRN3036). A. Bernabe-Ortiz is supported by Wellcome Trust (103994/Z/14/Z). D. Ariely is supported by the Center for Advanced Hindsight, Duke University.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus