Title
Clinical aspects of abdominal actinomycosis: a systematic review
Date Issued
01 July 2020
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Universidad de La Frontera
Publisher(s)
Blackwell Publishing
Abstract
Background: Abdominal actinomycosis (AA) is a rare infection. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence available on AA. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Data sources included Trip Database, BIREME, SciELO, Cochrane Library, WoS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, IBECS and LILACS. Eligibility criteria included: studies related to surgically treated AA, in adult population, without language and sex restriction, published between 1966 and 2019. The following variables were analysed: publication year, age, sex, geographical origin, location of lesions, clinical manifestations, risk factors, species isolated and treatments used. Results: A total of 1505 studies were initially identified. After scrutinizing titles and abstracts, and checking duplications, 221 articles including 406 subjects with AA were included. All were case reports or series. Mean age of subjects was 49.2 years and 56.2% were female. The highest proportion of articles was published between 2015 and 2019 (18.7%). Publications were predominantly from the USA (12.2%). Structures usually involved were abdominal wall, colon and appendix. The most common presentation was abdominal mass (39.2%). In 42.1% of patients, an associated factor was found, highlighting intrauterine devices (14.3%). The microbiology studies highlighted Actinomyces israelli. Morbidity, recurrence and verified mortality were 18.2%, 1.0% and 2.2%, respectively. Penicillin was the most used antibiotic. Conclusion: Evidence about AA is scarce and dispersed within a reduced range of articles and cases.
Start page
1465
End page
1468
Volume
90
Issue
August 7
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Obstetricia, Ginecología
Micología
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85088797005
PubMed ID
Source
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ISSN of the container
14451433
Sponsor(s)
This study was partially financed by the project CONICYT MEC 80190026.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus