cris.boxmetadata.label.title
Periodicities in fair weather potential gradient data from multiple stations at different latitudes
cris.boxmetadata.label.dateissued
01 browse.startsWith.months.october 2022
cris.boxmetadata.label.accesslevel
open access
cris.boxmetadata.label.resourcetype
journal article
cris.boxmetadata.label.authors
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
University of Rostock, Rostock
cris.boxmetadata.label.publisher
Elsevier Ltd
cris.boxmetadata.label.abstract
Analysis of the variation of the potential gradient (PG) at ground level is important to monitor the global electric circuit and the different solar and geophysical phenomena affecting it. However, this is challenging since several local factors (e.g., meteorological) produce perturbations in the potential gradient. Time series and spectral analysis of PG at several stations can help to minimise local effects so that global effects may be more clearly observed. In this work, for the first time we performed spectral analysis of the potential gradient recorded at several sites located at Vostok, Concordia, Halley and Casleo (Southern Hemisphere), and Sodankyla and Reading (Northern Hemisphere). In order to find the main periodicities and how the amplitude of those periods change as a function of time we use the Lomb-Scargle periodogram and the wavelet transform, respectively. For all PG sites we found periodicities of 0.5-, 1-, ~180- and 365-day. Our results show that the 0.5-day (1-day) periodicity is more prominent during the months of June–July-August (December–January-February). Evidence of ~27- and ~ 45-day periods was also observed at multiple sites. Further analysis using the cross-wavelet transform for PG versus cosmic rays, PG versus Madden-Julian Oscillation index, and PG versus meteorological parameters, show clues that the 27- and 45-day periods are likely related to the solar rotation and Madden-Julian Oscillation, respectively. Furthermore, our results show that during the passages of co-rotating interaction regions, the 27-day period for PG vs cosmic rays XWT is stronger than for the other XWT analysis.
cris.boxmetadata.label.volume
276
cris.boxmetadata.label.language
English
cris.boxmetadata.label.ocdeknowledgeArea
MeteorologÃa y ciencias atmosféricas
cris.boxmetadata.label.subjects
cris.boxmetadata.label.doi
cris.boxmetadata.label.scopusidentifier
2-s2.0-85133892059
cris.boxmetadata.label.source
Atmospheric Research
cris.boxmetadata.label.partofresource
Atmospheric Research
cris.boxmetadata.label.containerissn
01698095
cris.boxmetadata.label.sourcefunding
Natural Environment Research Council
cris.boxmetadata.label.sponsor
KAN acknowledges an Independent Research Fellowship funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) ( NE/L011514/1 and NE/L011514/2 ). JT acknowledges the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange for funding of the Ulam Program scholarship agreement no PPN/ULM/2019/1/00328/U/00001.
peru-layout.shadow-copies
Directorio de Producción CientÃfica
Scopus