Title
Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: Follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials
Date Issued
01 January 2014
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Ronco G.
Dillner J.
Elfström K.M.
Tunesi S.
Snijders P.J.F.
Arbyn M.
Kitchener H.
Segnan N.
Gilham C.
Giorgi-Rossi P.
Berkhof J.
Peto J.
Meijer C.J.L.M.
Cuzick J.
Zappa M.
Carozzi F.
Confortini M.
Dalla Palma P.
Zorzi M.
Del Mistro A.
Gillio-Tos A.
Naldoni C.
Rijkaart D.
Van Kemenade F.
Bulkmans N.
Heideman D.
Rozendaal R.
Kenter G.
Roberts C.
Desai M.
Sargent A.
Ryd W.
Naucler P.
International Agency for Research on Cancer
Publisher(s)
Elsevier B.V.
Abstract
Background: In four randomised trials, human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening for cervical cancer was compared with cytology-based cervical screening, and precursors of cancer were the endpoint in every trial. However, direct estimates are missing of the relative efficacy of HPV-based versus cytology-based screening for prevention of invasive cancer in women who undergo regular screening, of modifiers (eg, age) of this relative efficacy, and of the duration of protection. We did a follow-up study of the four randomised trials to investigate these outcomes. Methods: 176 464 women aged 20-64 years were randomly assigned to HPV-based (experimental arm) or cytology-based (control arm) screening in Sweden (Swedescreen), the Netherlands (POBASCAM), England (ARTISTIC), and Italy (NTCC). We followed up these women for a median of 6·5 years (1 214 415 person-years) and identified 107 invasive cervical carcinomas by linkage with screening, pathology, and cancer registries, by masked review of histological specimens, or from reports. Cumulative and study-adjusted rate ratios (experimental vs control) were calculated for incidence of invasive cervical carcinoma. Findings: The rate ratio for invasive cervical carcinoma among all women from recruitment to end of follow-up was 0·60 (95% CI 0·40-0·89), with no heterogeneity between studies (p=0·52). Detection of invasive cervical carcinoma was similar between screening methods during the first 2·5 years of follow-up (0·79, 0·46-1·36) but was significantly lower in the experimental arm thereafter (0·45, 0·25-0·81). In women with a negative screening test at entry, the rate ratio was 0·30 (0·15-0·60). The cumulative incidence of invasive cervical carcinoma in women with negative entry tests was 4·6 per 105 (1·1-12·1) and 8·7 per 105 (3·3- 18·6) at 3·5 and 5·5 years, respectively, in the experimental arm, and 15·4 per 105 (7·9-27·0) and 36·0 per 105 (23·2-53·5), respectively, in the control arm. Rate ratios did not differ by cancer stage, but were lower for adenocarcinoma (0·31, 0·14-0·69) than for squamous-cell carcinoma (0·78, 0·49-1·25). The rate ratio was lowest in women aged 30-34 years (0·36, 0·14-0·94). Interpretation: HPV-based screening provides 60-70% greater protection against invasive cervical carcinomas compared with cytology. Data of large-scale randomised trials support initiation of HPV-based screening from age 30 years and extension of screening intervals to at least 5 years. Funding: European Union, Belgian Foundation Against Cancer, KCE-Centre d'Expertise, IARC, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, the Italian Ministry of Health.
Start page
524
End page
532
Volume
383
Issue
9916
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Obstetricia, Ginecología Oncología
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84895909567
PubMed ID
Source
The Lancet
ISSN of the container
01406736
Sponsor(s)
This study was funded by the European Union ( PREDHICT project , FP7 grant agreement no 242061 ), Belgian Foundation Against Cancer, KCE-Centre d'Expertise (Brussels, Belgium), IARC (Lyon, France), The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (The Hague), and the Italian Ministry of Health. We thank all the staff for assistance in running the four randomised trials and the women who participated.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus