Title
Clinical named-entity recognition: A short comparison
Date Issued
01 November 2019
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
conference paper
Author(s)
Stanford University
Publisher(s)
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Abstract
The adoption of electronic health records has increased the volume of clinical data, which has opened an opportunity for healthcare research. There are several biomedical annotation systems that have been used to facilitate the analysis of clinical data. However, there is a lack of clinical annotation comparisons to select the most suitable tool for a specific clinical task. In this work, we used clinical notes from the MIMIC-III database and evaluated three annotation systems to identify four types of entities: (1) procedure, (2) disorder, (3) drug, and (4) anatomy. Our preliminary results demonstrate that BioPortal performs well when extracting disorder and drug. This can provide clinical researchers with real-clinical insights into patient's health patterns and it may allow to create a first version of an annotated dataset.
Start page
1548
End page
1550
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Bioinformática
Biotecnología relacionada con la salud
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85084331400
Resource of which it is part
Proceedings - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2019
ISBN of the container
9781728118673
Conference
Proceedings - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2019
Sponsor(s)
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01CA183962. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus