Title
Use of combined hormonal contraceptives among women with systemic lupus erythematosus with and without medical contraindications to oestrogen
Date Issued
01 July 2019
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Mendel A.
Bernatsky S.
Pineau C.A.
St-Pierre Y.
Hanly J.G.
Urowitz M.B.
Clarke A.E.
Romero-Diaz J.
Gordon C.
Bae S.C.
Wallace D.J.
Merrill J.T.
Buyon J.
Isenberg D.A.
Rahman A.
Ginzler E.M.
Petri M.
Dooley M.A.
Fortin P.
Gladman D.D.
Steinsson K.
Ramsey-Goldman R.
Khamashta M.A.
Aranow C.
MacKay M.
Manzi S.
Nived O.
Jönsen A.
Zoma A.A.
Van Vollenhoven R.F.
Ramos-Casals M.
Ruiz-Irastorza G.
Lim S.
Kalunian K.C.
Inanc M.
Kamen D.L.
Peschken C.A.
Jacobsen S.
Askanase A.
Sanchez-Guerrero J.
Bruce I.N.
Costedoat-Chalumeau N.
Vinet E.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Publisher(s)
Oxford University Press
Abstract
Objectives. To assess the prevalence of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) in reproductive-age women with SLE with and without possible contraindications and to determine factors associated with their use in the presence of possible contraindications. Methods. This observational cohort study included premenopausal women ages 18-45 years enrolled in the SLICC Registry ≤15 months after SLE onset, with annual assessments spanning 2000-2017. World Health Organization Category 3 or 4 contraindications to CHCs (e.g. hypertension, aPL) were assessed at each study visit. High disease activity (SLEDAI score >12 or use of >0.5 mg/kg/day of prednisone) was considered a relative contraindication. Results. A total of 927 SLE women contributed 6315 visits, of which 3811 (60%) occurred in the presence of one or more possible contraindication to CHCs. Women used CHCs during 512 (8%) visits, of which 281 (55%) took place in the setting of one or more possible contraindication. The most frequently observed contraindications were aPL (52%), hypertension (34%) and migraine with aura (22%). Women with one or more contraindication were slightly less likely to be taking CHCs [7% of visits (95% CI 7, 8)] than women with no contraindications [9% (95% CI 8, 10)]. Conclusion. CHC use was low compared with general population estimates (>35%) and more than half of CHC users had at least one possible contraindication. Many yet unmeasured factors, including patient preferences, may have contributed to these observations. Further work should also aim to clarify outcomes associated with this exposure.
Start page
1259
End page
1267
Volume
58
Issue
7
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Medicina clínica Reumatología
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85068445914
PubMed ID
Source
Rheumatology (United Kingdom)
ISSN of the container
14620324
Sponsor(s)
EV receives salary support from a Fonds de Recherche Québec Santé Clinical Research Scholar Junior 1 Award. SCB is supported by the Bio and Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2017M3A9B4050335). SJ is supported by the Danish Rheumatism Association (A-3865). AC is supported by an Arthritis Society Chair in Rheumatic Diseases. The Hopkins Lupus Cohort is supported by a National Institutes of Health grant (R01 AR069572) awarded to MP. The Birmingham SLICC cohort was funded by a Lupus UK grant awarded to CG. EV had full access to all the data in this study and takes full responsibility as a guarantor of the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. EV, AM, SB, CAP, YSP, JGH, MBU, AEC, JR, CG, SCB, DJW, JTM, JB, DAI, AR, EMG, MP, MAD, PF, DDG, KS, RRG, MAK, CA, MM, GSA, SM, ON, AJ, AAZ, RFV, MR, GR, SL, KCK, DLK, CP. SJ, AA, JS, INB and NCC conceived and designed the study. EV, AM, SB, CAP, YSP, JGH, MBU, AEC, JR, CG, SCB, DJW, JTM, JB, DAI, AR, EMG, MP, MAD, PF, DDG, KS, RRG, MAK, CA, MM, GSA, SM, ON, AJ, AAZ, RFV, MR, GR, SL, KCK, DLK, CP. SJ, AA, JS, INB and NCC analysed the data. EV, AM, SB, CAP, YSP, JGH, MBU, AEC, JR, CG, SCB, DJW, JTM, JB, DAI, AR, EMG, MP, MAD, PF, DDG, KS, RRG, MAK, CA, MM, GSA, SM, ON, AJ, AAZ, RFV, MR, GR, SL, KCK, DLK, CP. SJ, AA, JS, INB and NCC interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. This study was funded through a McGill University Health Centre Research Award.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus