Title
Survival and early growth of 51 tropical tree species in areas degraded by artisanal gold mining in the Peruvian Amazon
Date Issued
15 January 2021
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Cabanillas F.
Lefebvre D.
Farfan J.
Alferez J.
Llacsahuanga J.
Vega C.M.
Velasquez M.
Condori E.
Ascorra C.
Fernandez L.E.
Silman M.R.
Publisher(s)
Elsevier B.V.
Abstract
Artisanal gold mining in Amazon forests and rivers has been reported in all Amazonian countries. Amazon mining has a wide range of negative effects and severe environmental and social consequences. Given that the activity in the region is mostly illegal, there are few studies published in the scientific literature on recovery of areas degraded by gold mining. This study conducts an experimental reforestation project aimed to evaluate soil degradation and explore the seedling survivorship and early growth of 51 tropical tree species in gold mined areas at 5 study sites distributed across the Madre de Dios region, in the Peruvian Amazon. The study evaluates the effect of biochar amendments on the survivorship and growth of 51 tropical species. The study also analyzes the influence of species wood density on seedling performance one year after planting. In order to inform further restoration plantation strategies, species were chosen with the end goals of timber production, biodiversity enhancement, and soil restoration. Site degradation, soil properties and mercury levels were analyzed in degraded areas and paired reference forest patches. Soils after gold mining are found to be highly degraded, with soil C being nearly absent, cation content greatly decreased, and loss of fine sediment. Soil mercury levels were found below national and international environmental quality standards. A positive correlation and a statistically significant relationship were found between survivorship and wood density. This reveals that the higher the wood density of the species, the higher the survival percentage. Growth and overall performance of mid, and especially low wood density species were significantly increased by biochar additions, while no effect was recorded on high wood density species growth. The study provides guidance on the post-ASGM restoration potential for 51 common and useful tree species and gives practitioners recommendations for combinations of species and fertilization treatments to optimize restoration designs.
Volume
159
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Ecología
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85095839865
Source
Ecological Engineering
ISSN of the container
09258574
Sponsor(s)
We thank the team of field assistants that helped carry out this study, in particular Massiel Cueto, Martín Pillaca, Jorge Caballero, Vivian Ruiz, Aldo Rivas, Shamir Delgado, Midori Chinen, Miguel Macedo, Yulissa Barrios, Alfredo Rivera, Judith Soethe, Alex Boyd, Julinho Quispe, Yhonatan Calla, José Carlos Valadez, Raul Nava, Daniel Sotelo and Miguel Torres. We thank landowners and concessionaires Pedro Ynfantes, Jose Flores, and Policarpo Monzon who gave permission to work in their areas. We thank Martin Pillaca, Jorge Caballero, and Max Messinger for drone imagery and GIS analysis. We thank the Municipality of Inambari and the local NGO Camino Verde for producing the seedlings for the experiment. We also thank Vasco Masias and Yngrid Espinoza from Grupo Alimenta, as well as Forestal Otorongo, for their contribution to the biochar production. We specially thank Ing. Carlos Llerena† for his guidance and energy in supporting forestry science in Peru in general, and his deep support for the CINCIA project in particular. This study was possible through the funding provided by the World Wildlife Fund (Agreement OT-11) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of USAID/WFU Cooperative Agreement No. AID-527-A-16-00001. Additional funding was provided by the Wake Forest Center for Energy, Environment, and Sustainability.
This study was possible through the funding provided by the World Wildlife Fund (Agreement OT-11) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of USAID/WFU Cooperative Agreement No. AID-527-A-16-00001. Additional funding was provided by the Wake Forest Center for Energy, Environment, and Sustainability.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus