Title
Evaluation of a new serological technique for detecting rabies virus antibodies following vaccination
Date Issued
03 August 2012
Access level
metadata only access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Ma X.
Niezgoda M.
Blanton J.
Rupprecht C.
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases
Abstract
Two major techniques are currently used to estimate rabies virus antibody values: neutralization assays, such as the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). The RFFIT is considered the gold standard assay and has been used to assess the titer of rabies virus neutralizing antibodies for more than three decades. In the late 1970s, ELISA began to be used to estimate the level of rabies virus antibody and has recently been used by some laboratories as an alternate screening test for animal sera. Although the ELISA appears simpler, safer and more efficient, the assay is less sensitive in detecting low values of rabies virus neutralizing antibodies than neutralization tests. This study was designed to evaluate a new ELISA-based method for detecting rabies virus binding antibody. This new technique uses electro-chemi-luminescence labels and carbon electrode plates to detect binding events. In this comparative study, the RFFIT and the new ELISA-based technique were used to evaluate the level of rabies virus antibodies in human and animal serum samples. By using a conservative approximation of 0.15. IU/ml as a cutoff point, the new ELISA-based technique demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95% for human samples and for experimental animal samples. The sensitivity and specificity for field animal samples was 96% and 95%, respectively. The preliminary results from this study appear promising and demonstrate a higher sensitivity than traditional ELISA methods. © 2012.
Start page
5358
End page
5362
Volume
30
Issue
36
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Virología Crías y mascotas
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-84863993348
PubMed ID
Source
Vaccine
ISSN of the container
18732518
Source funding
U.S. Department of Energy
Sponsor(s)
We thank members of the Rabies Program, Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, CDC, for their comments and help especially Dr. Xianfu Wu and Olga Urazova. We thank our colleagues in the Wildlife Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture for experimental and field animal sera collection. This research was supported in part by an appointment to the Research Participation Program at the CDC administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and CDC.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus