This research shows that there is no antagonistic opposition between pre-Hispanic Andean philosophy and the development of philosophy, nor with Western Greek philosophy, except in the forms of its special theme or deepening of the specific philosophical problem, because in no case it is contrary to the law of philosophical development, and from it we must understand that the names, words or terms used to name the concepts even being different have the same content and follow the same logic of development. For example, “Pacha” is the closer formulation to the scientific concept of space/time, since it overtakes the impossibility of separating space and time from objects or phenomena from the objective reality, it is achieved not as a scientific discovery but as a need to draw up the thought about this phenomenon, so similar to modern science. Or Cay and Camac, concepts of “matter” and “ideal reality”, lost or hidden in pre-Hispanic texts, they are categories that solve the fundamental problems of philosophy, such as about “What is the “actual being”,” or about the relationship between being and thinking. Likewise, it is considered that pre-Hispanic Andean idealism does not differ antagonistically from classical Greek idealism, contrary to that, it is possible to discuss on the same level with Plato or with any idealist of the Greek Classic philosophy.