Title
Dynamics of the ruminal microbial ecosystem, and inhibition of methanogenesis and propiogenesis in response to nitrate feeding to Holstein calves
Date Issued
01 December 2021
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Gere J.
Marcoppido G.
Depetris G.
Cravero S.
Faverín C.
Cataldi A.
Cerón-Cucchi M.E.
Institute of Pathobiology
Lincoln University
Publisher(s)
KeAi Communications Co.
Abstract
It is known that nitrate inhibits ruminal methanogenesis, mainly through competition with hydrogenotrophic methanogens for available hydrogen (H2) and also through toxic effects on the methanogens. However, there is limited knowledge about its effects on the others members of ruminal microbiota and their metabolites. In this study, we investigated the effects of dietary nitrate inclusion on enteric methane (CH4) emission, temporal changes in ruminal microbiota, and fermentation in Holstein calves. Eighteen animals were maintained in individual pens for 45 d. Animals were randomly allocated to either a control (CTR) or nitrate (NIT, containing 15 g of calcium nitrate/kg dry matter) diets. Methane emissions were estimated using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer method. Ruminal microbiota changes and ruminal fermentation were evaluated at 0, 4, and 8 h post-feeding. In this study, feed dry matter intake (DMI) did not differ between dietary treatments (P > 0.05). Diets containing NIT reduced CH4 emissions by 27% (g/d) and yield by 21% (g/kg DMI) compared to the CTR (P < 0.05). The pH values and total volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentration did not differ between dietary treatments (P > 0.05) but differed with time, and post-feeding (P < 0.05). Increases in the concentrations of ruminal ammonia nitrogen (NH3–N) and acetate were observed, whereas propionate decreased at 4 h post-feeding with the NIT diet (P < 0.05). Feeding the NIT diet reduced the populations of total bacteria, total methanogens, Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and the abundance of Succiniclasticum, Coprococcus, Treponema, Shuttlewortia, Succinivibrio, Sharpea, Pseudobutyrivibrio, and Selenomona (P < 0.05); whereas, the population of total fungi, protozoa, Fibrobacter succinogenes, Atopobium and Erysipelotrichaceae L7A_E11 increased (P < 0.05). In conclusion, feeding nitrate reduces enteric CH4 emissions and the methanogens population, whereas it decreases the propionate concentration and the abundance of bacteria involved in the succinate and acrylate pathways. Despite the altered fermentation profile and ruminal microbiota, DMI was not influenced by dietary nitrate. These findings suggest that nitrate has a predominantly direct effect on the reduction of methanogenesis and propionate synthesis.
Start page
1205
End page
1218
Volume
7
Issue
4
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Nutrición, Dietética Ciencia animal, Ciencia de productos lácteos
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85122706246
Source
Animal Nutrition
ISSN of the container
24056545
Sponsor(s)
This study was supported by a grant from the FonCyT-Argentina: PICT 2015-294, PID MS-UTNBA-0004540 and INTA I058. We wish to thank Dra Milka Popova (from INRAE-France) for the support in the bioinformatics analysis. We also thank Eng. Ricardo Bualo and Ricardo Arias for their help and technical support in methane emission measurements.
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus