Title
Comparison of resilience of different plant teams to drought and temperature extremes in Denmark in sole and intercropping systems
Date Issued
01 January 2021
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
University of Copenhagen
Publisher(s)
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Abstract
Intercropping (IC) can reduce nitrogen fertilizer requirements, supress weeds, and improve crop yields and yield stability. Three field trials were conducted in Denmark in 2018 with intercropping and sole crops (SC) using spring wheat, barley, faba bean and field pea to compare productivity under five fertilizer levels. The trials were carried out using in a split-plot design with four. Anomalous weather during the 2018 cropping season created drought conditions and high temperatures above 31°C. No effect of fertilizer treatment was found, and total dry matter and grain yields were supressed in all systems. Wheat grain yields averaged 2.14 t ha−1 across systems, ranging from 1.58 t ha−1 as a component of the IC to 2.44 t ha−1 as SC, and barley grain yields averaged 2.35 t ha−1. Faba bean yielded 1.78 t ha−1 as SC, but failed in the IC. Pea failed in both systems. Intercropping barley with cover crops had no effect on grain yield or total dry matter. These results suggest that intercropping provided no production advantage during a drought and illuminate the need to continue conducting research and breeding on drought-resistant cultivars.
Start page
645
End page
655
Volume
71
Issue
7
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Agronomía
Subjects
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-85107464068
Source
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B: Soil and Plant Science
ISSN of the container
09064710
Sponsor(s)
Financial support was provided by the WaterFARMING project (Grant Agreement No: 689271), and SustainFARM (Grant Agreement No: 652615) projects. The authors wish to thank the technical staff at Taastrup experimental farms for aid in the establishment of the field trials. We are grateful for the time and attention to the original manuscript by two anonymous reviewers, whose comments have helped to improve the paper.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus