Title
Azathioprine versus d‐penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis patients who have been treated unsuccessfully with gold
Date Issued
01 January 1984
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Paulus H.E.
Williams H.J.
Ward J.R.
Reading J.C.
Egger M.J.
Coleman M.L.
Samuelson C.O.
Willkens R.F.
Guttadauria M.
Kaplan S.B.
Maclaughlin E.J.
Weinstein A.
Wilder R.L.
Solsky M.A.
Meenan R.F.
University of Alabama in Birmingham
Abstract
Two hundred six patients were entered into a prospective controlled, double‐blind, multicenter trial comparing azathioprine (AZA) 1.25–1.5 mg/kg/day with D‐penicillamine (DP) 10–12 mg/kg/day. One hundred thirty‐four patients completed 24 weeks of therapy. Improvement in nearly all efficacy variables was seen in both groups. Patients taking DP demonstrated a greater rise in hemoglobin concentration and greater fall in erythrocyte sedimentation rate than patients receiving AZA; these were the only efficacy variables with a significant difference between the treatment groups. Fewer withdrawals for adverse reactions occurred among the patients receiving AZA, but the difference was not significant. Patients receiving AZA were withdrawn from the drug mainly for abnormal liver function test results, nausea and gastrointestinal upset, and leukopenia. The main reasons for withdrawal of patients receiving DP were nausea, rash and pruritis, thrombo‐cytopenia, dysgeusia, and proteinuria. Copyright © 1984 American College of Rheumatology
Start page
721
End page
727
Volume
27
Issue
7
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Farmacología, Farmacia Reumatología Inmunología
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-0021249951
PubMed ID
Source
Arthritis & Rheumatism
ISSN of the container
00043591
DOI of the container
10.1002/art.1780270701
Sources of information: Directorio de Producción Científica Scopus