Title
Diagnostic approaches for paediatric tuberculosis by use of different specimen types, culture methods, and PCR: A prospective case-control study
Date Issued
01 September 2010
Access level
open access
Resource Type
journal article
Author(s)
Oberhelman R.
Soto-Castellares G.
Del Pino T.
Salazar-Lindo E.
Negron E.
Montenegro S.
Publisher(s)
Elsevier
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis presents challenges in children because symptoms are non-specific, specimens are difficult to obtain, and cultures and smears of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are often negative. We assessed new diagnostic approaches for tuberculosis in children in a resource-poor country. Methods: Children with symptoms suggestive of pulmonary tuberculosis (cases) were enrolled from August, 2002, to January, 2007, at two hospitals in Lima, Peru. Age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled from a low-income shanty town community in south Lima. Cases were grouped into moderate-risk and high-risk categories by Stegen-Toledo score. Two specimens of each type (gastric-aspirate, nasopharyngeal-aspirate, and stool specimens) taken from each case were examined for M tuberculosis by auramine smear microscopy, broth culture by microscopic-observation drug-susceptibility (MODS) technique, standard culture on Lowenstein-Jensen medium, and heminested IS6110 PCR. Specimens from controls consisted of one nasopharyngeal-aspirate and two stool samples, examined with the same techniques. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00054769. Findings: 218 cases and 238 controls were enrolled. 22 (10%) cases had at least one positive M tuberculosis culture (from gastric aspirate in 22 cases, nasopharyngeal aspirate in 12 cases, and stool in four cases). Laboratory confirmation of tuberculosis was more frequent in cases at high risk for tuberculosis (21 [14·1%] of 149 cases with complete specimen collection were culture positive) than in cases at moderate risk for tuberculosis (one [1·6%] of 61). MODS was more sensitive than Lowenstein-Jensen culture, diagnosing 20 (90·9%) of 22 patients compared with 13 (59·1%) of 22 patients (p=0·015), and M tuberculosis isolation by MODS was faster than by Lowenstein-Jensen culture (mean 10 days, IQR 8-11, vs 25 days, 20-30; p=0·0001). All 22 culture-confirmed cases had at least one culture-positive gastric-aspirate specimen. M tuberculosis was isolated from the first gastric-aspirate specimen obtained in 16 (72·7%) of 22 cases, whereas in six (27·3%), only the second gastric-aspirate specimen was culture positive (37% greater yield by adding a second specimen). In cases at high risk for tuberculosis, positive results from one or both gastric-aspirate PCRs identified a subgroup with a 50% chance of having a positive culture (13 of 26 cases). Interpretation: Collection of duplicate gastric-aspirate specimens from high-risk children for MODS culture was the best available diagnostic test for pulmonary tuberculosis. PCR was insufficiently sensitive or specific for routine diagnostic use, but in high-risk children, duplicate gastric-aspirate PCR provided same-day identification of half of all culture-positive cases. Funding: National Institutes of Health. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.
Start page
612
End page
620
Volume
10
Issue
9
Language
English
OCDE Knowledge area
Sistema respiratorio
Pediatría
Scopus EID
2-s2.0-77955920180
PubMed ID
Source
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
ISSN of the container
14733099
Sponsor(s)
This study was supported in part by the following grants: National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1 RO1 AI-49139 , USAID—Tuberculosis Award HRN-5986-A-00-6006-00 , NIH ITREID grant 5D43-TW00910 , the Fogarty-NIH AIDS training programme 3T22-TW00016-05S3 , and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases tutorial training grant 5T35-AI07646-02 . Some co-investigators were supported by IFHAD and FIND (CAE) and the Wellcome Trust (CAE, DAJM). Naval Medical Research Center Detachment work was supported by Work Unit Number (WUN) 62787A.873.H.B000 . The research study described was supported entirely by the first grant listed, whereas the other grants supported personnel and expenses of the tuberculosis diagnostic laboratory used in the study. VAL-T is employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the US Government.
Sources of information:
Directorio de Producción Científica
Scopus